Home About Us Contact Us

 


 

Table of Content - Volume 18 Issue 1 - April 2021



The role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of intra-cranial lesions

 

Vijay Indal Naik1*, Vinod Narayanrao Chaudhari2

 

1,2Associate Professor, Department of Radio Diagnosis, Dr. Ulhas Patil Medical College, Jalgaon, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: drvinodchoudhari@yahoo.co.in

 

Abstract              Background: Differentiating brain infections from brain tumors (abscesses from necrotic or cystic brain tumors and encephalitis from diffuse gliomas) is a fundamental clinical issue as the strategies for their management and their prognosis differ completely. Unfortunately, this differentiation remains a diagnostic challenge for both neurologists and radiologists. In present study we aimed to study role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of intra-cranial lesions. Material and Methods: Present study was descriptive study conducted in patients referred to the for MRI brain with diffusion weighted imaging and were detected to have any of these Infarction, infective lesions, Tumors, Demyelination degenerative disorders Results: 100 patients underwent DW MRI during study period, most common age group was 51-60 years (36%), followed by 41-50 years (29%). Male patients (67%) were more than female (33%). Majority of patients had infarcts (48%) of which 25 were acute, 10 were chronic 3 were subacute. Other were tumors (32%), intra-axial tumours were 15, which includes GBM (5), Low grade glioma (2), Medulloblastomas (3), Lymphomas (3), anaplastic astrocytoma (1) hemangioblastoma (1). Extra-axial tumours were 17, which includes Meningiomas (10), arachnoid cysts (4) pituitary macroadenoma (3).24% had infective etiology tubercular granulomas (14%), NCC granulomas (3%), Abscesses (4%) Encephalitis (3%) were infective etiologies. 3% had demyelination all had multiple sclerosis. On DW MRI, most common finding was True diffusion restriction - hyperintensity on T2W images hypointensity on ADC images noted in 55 patients. Conclusion: Diffuse-weighted imaging should be used routinely as a valuable noninvasive tool besides conventional MRI, whenever available, to reach a definitive final diagnosis.

Keywords: diffusion-weighted MRI, infarct, ADC, True diffusion restriction

 

NTRODUCTION

Intracranial cystic lesions may be noninvasively diagnosed using Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), in vivo Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (PMRS), or a combination of DWI and PMRS. Diffusion-weighted imaging has an advantage over PMRS by virtue of its fast acquisition speed and relative ease of analysis.1 Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an acceptable technique for studying the movements of water molecules of tissue. In diffusion-weighted imaging we may face with drastically different signals, depending on cell density and the type of tissue. Measuring the diffusion coefficient in brain tumors allows the classification of tumor types and provide a definitive diagnosis of some kinds of tumors.2 Diffusion-weighted imaging helps in better delineation of brain abscess and tumor cysts by virtue of restricted and facilitated diffusion, respectively.3 Differentiating brain infections from brain tumors (abscesses from necrotic or cystic brain tumors and encephalitis from diffuse gliomas) is a fundamental clinical issue as the strategies for their management and their prognosis differ completely. Unfortunately, this differentiation remains a diagnostic challenge for both neurologists and radiologists. In present study we aimed to study role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of intra-cranial lesions.

              

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Present study was descriptive study conducted in Department of Radio Diagnosis, Dr. Ulhas Patil Medical College, Jalgaon. Study duration was of 1 & half years (from January 2019 to June 2020).

Inclusion criteria:

Patients referred to the for MRI brain with diffusion weighted imaging and were detected

to have any of these Infarction, infective lesions, Tumors, Demyelination degenerative disorders

Exclusion criteria:

Patients with intracranial hemorrhage

contraindication to MRI study such as patients with pacemakers, metallic implants and aneurysmal clips

Study was explained an informed consent was taken from patients/parents /guardians. 100 consecutive patients intracranial lesions suggested on computed tomography or conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, were studied with DWI.

Cranial MR imaging was performed on a whole-body 1.5-T MR system (Signa; General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) equipped with an actively shielded whole body magnetic field gradient set with a maximal strength of 33 mT/m using a quadrature birdcage head coil for radiofrequency transmission and reception. The routine imaging studies included FSE T2-WI (TR = 4900 milliseconds, TE = 85 milliseconds, n = 3) and SE T1-WI (TR = 650 milliseconds, TE = 14 milliseconds, n = 2). Diffusion-weighted EPI in the axial plane was performed using a single-shot EPI-SE pulse sequence with TR/TE = 10.5 s/110 milliseconds (minimum), field of view = 24 X 24 cm2, n = 2, slice thickness = 5 mm, interslice gap = 0.5 mm, and a matrix size of 128 X 256. Diffusion sensitizing gradients were sequentially applied along the 3 orthogonal directions with the diffusion-weighting factor (b) of b = 0 and 1000 seconds/mm2. Ramp sampling was used to reduce the echo spacing, thereby minimizing the geometric distortion.

Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics.


RESULTS

100 patients underwent DW MRI during study period, most common age group was 51-60 years (36%), followed by 41-50 years (29%). Male patients (67%) were more than female (33%).

Table 1: General characteristic

General characteristic

No. of patients = %

Age group

 

0-10

6

11–20

9

21–30

5

31–40

4

41–50

29

51–60

36

61–70

11

Gender

Male

67

Female

33

Majority of patients had infarcts (48%) of which 25 were acute, 10 were chronic 3 were subacute. Other were tumors (32%), intra-axial tumours were 15, which includes GBM (5), Low grade glioma (2), Medulloblastomas (3), Lymphomas (3), anaplastic astrocytoma (1) hemangioblastoma (1). Extra-axial tumours were 17, which includes Meningiomas (10), arachnoid cysts (4) pituitary macroadenoma (3).24% had infective etiology tubercular granulomas (14%), NCC granulomas (3%), Abscesses (4%) Encephalitis (3%) were infective etiologies. 3% had demyelination all had multiple sclerosis.

Table 2: Etiology DW-MRI picture

 

Etiology

true diffusion

restriction -

no signal change on T2W images

hypointensity on DWI and T2 FLAIR

T2 shine through

T2 washout

total

1

Infarcts

48

A

acute infarcts,.

22

3

25

B

chronic infarcts -

5

5

10

C

subacute infarcts

2

1

3

2

Tumours

32

A

Intra-axial

 

 

 

 

 

15

i

GBM

4

1

5

ii

Low grade glioma

1

1

2

iii

Medulloblastomas

3

3

iv

Lymphomas

3

3

v

anaplastic astrocytoma

1

1

vi

hemangioblastoma

1

1

B

Extra-axial

17

i

Meningiomas

6

3

1

10

ii

arachnoid cysts

4

4

iii

pituitary macroadenoma

3

3

3

Infective conditions

24

A

tubercular granulomas

5

2

7

14

B

NCC granulomas

3

3

C

Abscesses

4

4

D

Encephalitis

1

1

1

3

4

Demyelination

2

1

3

On DW MRI, most common finding was True diffusion restriction - hyperintensity on T2W images hypointensity on ADC images noted in 55 patients.

 

Table 3: Primary finding on DW MRI

Primary finding on DW MRI

No. of patients

True diffusion restriction - hyperintensity on T2W images hypointensity on ADC images

55

No signal change on T2W images

9

Hypointensity on DWI and T2 FLAIR images with hyperintensity on ADC images

8

T2 shine through

13

T2 washout

15

 


DISCUSSION

DWI explores the molecular characteristic of diffusivity of particles within a region. It is based on the application of two gradients at a set interval of time, in such a way that only a molecule that experiences both gradients at the same position produces signal. Therefore regions of the brain that show “restricted diffusion” are hyperintense on DWI. This restricted diffusion appears as hyperintense area on DWI and needs to be corroborated with computer generated apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps which show corresponding hypointense area. This corroboration rules out T2-shine through effect.4 Diffusionweighted imaging (DWI) has a welldefined role in differentiating between important intracranial lesions, namely, brain abscess, arachnoid cyst, cystic/necrotic tumor, and epidermoid tumor. Quantitative analysis allows one to clearly delineate vascular, inflammatory, metabolic, infectious, and nonvascular disorders.5,6 In a similar study, Pradeep Kumar7 had infarcts comprised the majority of lesions at 56 cases (50.9% of the total cases studied). Of these acute infarcts constituted 34 cases (60.7%); 19 (33.9%) were chronic infarcts and 3 (5.3%) were subacute infarcts. All cases of acute infarcts and 66.7% of subacute infarcts showed diffusion restriction. Among intra axial tumors true restriction was noted in 7 cases. 75% of glioblastoma multiforme showed true diffusion restriction. 100% of medulloblastomas and 100% of lymphomas showed diffusion restriction. Similar findings were noted in present study. Kamini Gupta8 studied 67 patients who underwent Conventional MR sequences along with DW and MRS were done after taking localisers in all the three planes. Most common cerebral neoplasms were metastases followed by Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM). Male: female ratio was 1.5:1. Headache was the most common presenting complaint. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values were similar in GBM and metastases but were higher in low grade gliomas. On MRS, choline levels in the areas of diffusion restriction were higher and NAA levels were lower in cases of GBM, metastases and lymphoma as compared to low grade gliomas. DW imaging with ADC values and MRS in combination with conventional MRI are very useful in detection of brain tumours and distinguishing low grade from high grade tumours. DWI plays an important role in the differentiation of these abscesses from necrotic neoplasms, which usually demonstrate high ADC values within the core. Luthra G et al.. observed diffusion restriction with low ADC value in both tubercular and pyogenic abscesses.9 Bacterial as well as tubercular abscesses show central diffusion restriction due to highly viscous necrotic tissue within.9 Reddy JS10 noted a high sensitivity and specificity of DWI for the diagnosis of brain abscess vs nonabscess cystic mass lesions. High specificity and sensitivity of DWI in the present and previously reported studies indicate reproducibility of the DWI over a number of studies High specificity and sensitivity of DWI for differentiation of abscess from nonabscess lesions is due to the difference in the contents of the cavities of both the etiology revealed by differences in macromolecular concentration, cell density, and viscosity of the fluid.11,12

CONCLUSION

Diffusion weighted MRI has been proven to be of excellent use in the characterization of infarcts and in the detection of acute infarcts. Diffuse-weighted imaging should be used routinely as a valuable noninvasive tool besides conventional MRI, whenever available, to reach a definitive final diagnosis.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Bukte Y, Paksoy Y, Genc E, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted MR in differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic lesions. Clin Radiol 2005; 60:375 - 83.;
  2. Zainab Yazdi Sotoodeh*, Vida Sargazi, Ali, Jafari Kalil Abadi, Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and ADC map of Brain Tumors, Ambient Science, 2018: Vol. 05(Sp1)
  3. Mishra AM, Gupta RK, Jaggi RS, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging and in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the differential diagnosis of ring-enhancing intracranial cystic mass lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:540 - 7.
  4. Desprechins B, Stadnik T, Koerts G, Shabana W, Breucq C, Osteaux M. Use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differential diagnosis between intracerebral necrotic tumors and cerebral abscesses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1252-1257
  5. Mascalchi M, Filippi M, Floris R, Fonda C, Gasparotti R, Villari N. Diffusionweighted MR of the brain: Methodology and clinical application. Radiol Med 2005;109:15597.
  6.  Naggara O, Letourneau-Guillon L, Mellerio C, Belair M, Pruvo JP, Leclerc X, et al. [Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain]. J Radiol 2010;91:329-51.
  7. P. Pradeep Kumar Reddy, P. Madhu. Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging features of intracranial lesions. International Journal of Contemporary Medicine Surgery and Radiology. 2018;3(2):B24-B30.
  8. Kamini Gupta, Nikhil Jain, Kavita Saggar, Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging and MR Spectroscopy in Characterisation of Intracranial Neoplasms, International Journal of Anatomy, Radiology and Surgery. 2018, Jul, Vol-7(3): RO55-RO61
  9. Luthra G, Parihar A, Nath K, Jaiswal S, Prasad KN, Husain N, Husain M et al. Comparative evaluation of fungal, tubercular, and pyogenic brain abscesses with conventional and diffusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Aug; 28(7):1332-
  10. Reddy JS, Mishra AM, Behari S, Husain M, Gupta V, Rastogi M, Gupta RK. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic mass lesions: a report of 147 lesions. Surg Neurol. 2006 Sep;66(3):246-50;
  11. Mishra AM, Gupta RK, Saksena S, et al. Biological correlates of diffusivity in brain abscess. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:878- 85.
  12. Kumar S, Mishra AM, Reddy JS, et al. Comparative evaluation of magnetization transfer and fluid-attenuating inversion recovery imaging in cystic intracranial mass lesions and their correlation with biological parameters. Proceedings 13th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2005. Miami, Fla; 2005. p. 227.









 


 

 


 

 











 



 








 





Policy for Articles with Open Access:

Authors who publish with MedPulse International Journal of Pediatrics (Print ISSN: 2579-0897) (Online ISSN: 2636-4662) agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.